If you want to know how it went, read my next blog, which will share the learning and suggest paths forward..
Stripping away previous knowledge, questioning potentially inefficient systems and modalities, is what is needed to allow these kinds of conversations to take place..This is the challenge to traditional design processes, which can be quite turgid and passive: a brief is stated and a firm contends with whether they can deliver the predefined needs of the client.
Interrogating the brief is not part of the process.. Elevating and liberating the brief into a problem statement is an essential part of the work and the design process of Design to Value.Collaborating to establish a set of working methods, goals and value drivers creates clarity of purpose from the start.It creates opportunity.. To purchase this book, visit., Asia-Pacific Lead at Bryden Wood, talks to.
, Director of Integration at.and MMC Lead for the.
They are joined by Simon McCarthy, Principal Structural Engineer from Bryden Wood.. Click the 'play button' above to listen in, or read our 5 Key Takeaways from this episode below.... 1.
Modern Methods of Construction (MMC) is a new, exciting market in Australia..All the parties involved in the IPD need to share in the value of the project.
The core project management KPI’s are scope, cost and time however purely focusing on these has two fundamental contra-indications.Firstly, they provide a limit to the value which can be delivered to the client: - as long as we get,.
, close to the time, cost and scope we have done a good enough job.If we shoot for the moon and get into orbit we have done well enough.. Secondly, there will be direct antagonism in the value sought by each delivery organisation, the parties will not be aligned in value drivers.. Open discussions and agreements need to be had about what value means firstly for the intent of the endeavour e.g.
(Editor: Heavyweight Lamps)